A quant’s perspective on the evolution of crypto

In the world of quantitative finance, we don’t look at assets through the lens of belief; we look at them through the lens of data. When I look at the cryptocurrency market, I don’t see "digital gold" or a "speculative bubble"—at least, not primarily. I see a rich, evolving ecosystem of volatility, market microstructure, and raw statistical behavior that is unlike anything we’ve seen in traditional finance (TradFi).

At Deriv, our mandate is to make trading accessible while managing the complex machinery of risk that operates beneath the surface. In my view, here is how the quantitative landscape of crypto is maturing.

The volatility paradox

To the average investor, volatility is a measure of fear. To a quant, volatility is the lifeblood of the market. It is the raw material from which we structure products and model opportunities.

Crypto is famous for its "fat tails"—extreme events that happen far more frequently than a standard bell curve (Gaussian distribution) would predict. In traditional forex, a 5-sigma move (a 5 standard deviation event) is a once-in-a-lifetime anomaly. In crypto, it’s a Tuesday.

For us, the challenge isn't to avoid this volatility, but to price it correctly. We are seeing the market move from pure directional betting to sophisticated volatility trading, where the magnitude of the move matters more than the direction.

Structuring the chaos: CFDs vs. "Perps"

To trade this volatility effectively, the market relies on delta-one derivatives. This brings us to one of the most persistent misunderstandings in the crypto space: the distinction between the "crypto-native" Perpetual Swap and the "traditional" Contract for Difference (CFD).

From a quantitative structuring perspective, the distinction is largely illusory. Mathematically speaking, a CFD and a Perpetual Swap are effectively the same instrument.

They are both designed to solve the exact same engineering problem: How do you tether a derivative's price to the underlying spot price indefinitely without an expiry date?

• In Crypto Native Perps: You have a "Funding Rate" exchanged between longs and shorts every 8 hours.
• In traditional CFDs: You have "Swap Rates" or overnight financing charges.

To my team, these are simply variables in the same equation. Whether you call it a funding rate or a swap rate, the mechanism ensures the derivative price converges with the spot price. We offer the CFD structure not because it is different in exposure, but because it wraps that exposure in a regulated framework. It is the same engine, just inside a chassis built for consumer protection rather than the "Wild West" environment of unregulated exchanges.

The data that never sleeps

Once we have the instruments, we face the operational reality: the 24/7 nature of the data stream.

In equities or forex, there is a "close." There is a weekend. These pauses allow for settlement, risk recalibration, and mental resets. Crypto offers no such respite. It is a continuous, unbroken time series.

This presents unique challenges for algorithmic modelling:

• Liquidity fragmentation: Unlike the NYSE, crypto liquidity is fractured across hundreds of venues.
• Arbitrage efficiency: The speed at which price discrepancies are closed between exchanges has increased dramatically, signaling a more efficient market.
• Correlation shifts: We watch closely how crypto correlates with the Nasdaq or gold. It is not a static relationship; it shifts based on macroeconomic liquidity conditions.

Risk management: The adult in the room

Finally, how do we survive in this environment? If there is one message I drive home to my team and our clients, it is this: Leverage is a double-edged sword, but in crypto, it is razor-sharp.

Because crypto assets can gap 20% in minutes, traditional risk models (like standard Value-at-Risk) often fail. We have to look at "Expected Shortfall"—what happens in the worst-case scenarios?

As the market matures, we are seeing a shift from "YOLO" (You Only Live Once) trading to structured risk management. Institutional adoption isn't just about ETFs; it's about bringing institutional-grade risk controls to the space. This means better custody, deeper order books, and reliable execution even during periods of high stress.

The road ahead

We are currently witnessing the convergence of DeFi (Decentralised Finance) concepts with CeFi (Centralised Finance) reliability.

From a quantitative perspective, the alpha (edge) in crypto is becoming harder to find as the market becomes more efficient. This is a good thing. It signals stability. Crypto is no longer a fringe experiment; it is a burgeoning asset class that demands respect, rigorous mathematics, and a steady hand.

‍